Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(tracing): avoid assigning span's local root to self, so that the python GC doesn't kick in [backport 2.14] #10838

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Backport e160b36 from #10809 to 2.14.

<<Description copied from the original PR>>

We (Modal Labs) noticed that enabling tracing in parts of our code caused the Python GC to kick in a lot and add large delays to our event loop. A simple repro (see test) showed us that there was a self reference cycle in span when a top-level span's local root was assigned to the span itself, preventing Python from cleaning up the objects by reference counting.

The change itself is pretty straightforward - we use None to represent when a span's local root is itself. The span still exposes _local_root with the same behavior via a property, and internally stores a _local_root_value that holds a non-self-referential span. This also means that the tracer no longer needs to explicitly set the local root for top-level spans. This should be fairly non-risky as it doesn't change any code behavior.

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

…python GC doesn't kick in (#10809)

_<<Description copied from the [original
PR](https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-py/pull/10624)>>_

We (Modal Labs) noticed that enabling tracing in parts of our code
caused the Python GC to kick in a lot and add large delays to our event
loop. A simple repro (see test) showed us that there was a self
reference cycle in span when a top-level span's local root was assigned
to the span itself, preventing Python from cleaning up the objects by
reference counting.

The change itself is pretty straightforward - we use None to represent
when a span's local root is itself. The span still exposes _local_root
with the same behavior via a property, and internally stores a
_local_root_value that holds a non-self-referential span. This also
means that the tracer no longer needs to explicitly set the local root
for top-level spans. This should be fairly non-risky as it doesn't
change any code behavior.

## Checklist
- [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
- The PR description includes an overview of the change
- The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
- The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing
strategy
- The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- The change follows the [library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
- The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
- Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))

## Reviewer Checklist
- [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
- Title is accurate
- All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance
implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

---------

Co-authored-by: Daniel Shaar <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Shaar <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e160b36)
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: backport-10809-to-2.14
Commit report: 49207aa
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 1286 Passed, 0 Skipped, 36m 36.28s Total duration (54.72s time saved)

@taegyunkim taegyunkim closed this Sep 26, 2024
@taegyunkim taegyunkim reopened this Sep 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

releasenotes/notes/fix-span-unnecessary-gc.yaml                         @DataDog/apm-python
ddtrace/_trace/span.py                                                  @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
ddtrace/_trace/tracer.py                                                @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
ddtrace/propagation/http.py                                             @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
tests/tracer/test_tracer.py                                             @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-09-26 19:33:57

Comparing candidate commit 49207aa in PR branch backport-10809-to-2.14 with baseline commit 467db5a in branch 2.14.

Found 6 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 350 metrics, 48 unstable metrics.

scenario:otelspan-add-metrics

  • 🟩 max_rss_usage [-10.189MB; -9.985MB] or [-28.208%; -27.643%]

scenario:otelspan-add-tags

  • 🟩 max_rss_usage [-9.166MB; -8.946MB] or [-26.098%; -25.472%]

scenario:span-add-metrics

  • 🟩 max_rss_usage [-18.189MB; -17.968MB] or [-37.127%; -36.676%]

scenario:span-add-tags

  • 🟩 max_rss_usage [-4.399MB; -4.192MB] or [-15.282%; -14.565%]

scenario:span-start

  • 🟩 execution_time [-2.431ms; -2.046ms] or [-12.138%; -10.218%]

scenario:span-start-traceid128

  • 🟩 execution_time [-2.434ms; -2.018ms] or [-11.968%; -9.921%]

@erikayasuda erikayasuda merged commit 300dfcc into 2.14 Sep 26, 2024
636 of 637 checks passed
@erikayasuda erikayasuda deleted the backport-10809-to-2.14 branch September 26, 2024 20:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants