Prefer part selector footprint by smaller area #375
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A cleaner version of sorting parts instead of by footprint name before, which mostly worked for 0402, ..., but did awful things for diodes. Also replaces the smd-min-package with a footprint (courtyard) area range. The default is set around 0603 (4mm^2).
Removes a bunch of footprint refinements on example designs, these mostly were to get reasonable diode / FET selections. The area-minimization now handles it. Some examples go from SOD-123 to SOD-323.
The footprint area calculator does not handle arcs, that may be future work.
Some cleanup of the existing parts tables, to unify sorting criteria and deduplicate code. A future PR will refactor those parts more.