Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify embedded proof extension point #1400

Closed
msporny opened this issue Dec 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Clarify embedded proof extension point #1400

msporny opened this issue Dec 26, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Dec 26, 2023

@iherman requested that we more generally specify the enveloped and embedded proof extension mechanisms, and then continue to normatively refer to the securing mechanisms that the WG has defined as RECOMMENDED mechanisms. @msporny clarified some guidelines around doing that.

This issue is being raised to track that concern.

@msporny msporny self-assigned this Dec 26, 2023
@msporny msporny added the ready for PR This issue is ready for a Pull Request to be created to resolve it label Dec 26, 2023
@msporny
Copy link
Member Author

msporny commented Dec 26, 2023

PR #1403 has been raised to address this issue. This issue will be closed once PR #1403 has been merged.

@msporny msporny added pr exists and removed ready for PR This issue is ready for a Pull Request to be created to resolve it labels Dec 26, 2023
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jan 4, 2024

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-01-03

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

2.3. Clarify embedded proof extension point (issue vc-data-model#1400)

See github issue vc-data-model#1400.

Brent Zundel: 1400 Clarify embedded proof extension point. also on track with this. expect it to be addressed by EOW.

@msporny
Copy link
Member Author

msporny commented Jan 6, 2024

PR #1403 has been merged, closing.

@msporny msporny closed this as completed Jan 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants