Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Bootc to Fedora 40 Based Images #572

Open
noelmiller opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Add Bootc to Fedora 40 Based Images #572

noelmiller opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request iso Issues relating to ISO images

Comments

@noelmiller
Copy link
Member

Purpose

We want to add bootc to our images to start utilizing it. This is the direction things are going with the creation of new upstream images that rely on bootc.

We reverted PR #570 due to issues it caused with the installation ISO. This is because we did not include creating the metadata needed to allow the installation to complete.

Current Plan

We need to test bootc in downstreams before it can be added to main. There is currently a branch in Bluefin that is testing adding bootc and the required command to that container. I would also like to test in Bazzite next.

@noelmiller noelmiller added enhancement New feature or request iso Issues relating to ISO images labels May 10, 2024
@m2Giles
Copy link
Member

m2Giles commented Jun 23, 2024

Learning from adding bootc to bluefin.

There are a few gotchas.

  1. F39 and F40 behave differently. The metadata change must only occur on F40. F39 does not have the same requirement. If the metadata change happens on a F39 build, it will fail to install.
  2. The metadata change must only ever be applied once. The change will persist across image builds. If it's applied more than once, it will error the build.
  3. If Fedora makes the change to provide the metadata themselves, we will need to remove the metadata write we perform.

The change is being applied to bluefin today (22 June 2024). I think that instead of having this in main, this should be held at the downstream image level due to the potential footgun of making an image that cannot be installed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request iso Issues relating to ISO images
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants