You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There has been some discussion in the TravisCI community as to how GitHub draft pull requests are handled. In my understanding, if a TravisCI build is requested for all open PRs to a given branch, draft PRs are treated as regular PRs for TravisCI and a TravisCI build will be launched.
For some project, it could be a useful feature to disable TravisCI builds for draft PRs in order to take a weight off of TravisCI jobs.
Could travis-conditions give enough flexibility to let the user decide on the behavior for draft PRs? For instance, adding a new option draft_pull_request for type (currently available are push, pull_request, api, cron)?
Thanks!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
MaxThevenet
changed the title
Use travis-condition to give users flexibility for draft PRs?
Use travis-conditions to give users flexibility for draft PRs?
Apr 2, 2020
There has been some discussion in the TravisCI community as to how GitHub draft pull requests are handled. In my understanding, if a TravisCI build is requested for all open PRs to a given branch, draft PRs are treated as regular PRs for TravisCI and a TravisCI build will be launched.
For some project, it could be a useful feature to disable TravisCI builds for draft PRs in order to take a weight off of TravisCI jobs.
Could
travis-conditions
give enough flexibility to let the user decide on the behavior for draft PRs? For instance, adding a new optiondraft_pull_request
for type (currently available arepush
,pull_request
,api
,cron
)?Thanks!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: