You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the README, there is an example to support existing types with different bridges, you can extend it similarly:
extension Data: DefaultsSerializable {
public static var _defaultsArray: DefaultsArrayBridge<[T]> { DefaultsArrayBridge() }
public static var _defaults: DefaultsDataBridge { DefaultsDataBridge() }
}
However, saying if I'd like to use a different bridge on Data type. For example,
public struct MyDataBridge: DefaultsBridge {
public init() {}
public func save(key: String, value: Data?, userDefaults: UserDefaults) {
// Do nothing
}
public func get(key: String, userDefaults: UserDefaults) -> Data? {
return nil
}
public func deserialize(_ object: Any) -> Data? {
return nil
}
}
extension Data: DefaultsSerializable {
public static var _defaults: MyDataBridge { MyDataBridge() }
}
I will get the compilation warning of Conformance of 'Data' to protocol 'DefaultsSerializable' was already stated in the protocol's module 'SwiftyUserDefaults'. So is it even possible to change the bridge for types that have already been implemented in the module?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the README, there is an example to support existing types with different bridges, you can extend it similarly:
However, saying if I'd like to use a different bridge on
Data
type. For example,I will get the compilation warning of
Conformance of 'Data' to protocol 'DefaultsSerializable' was already stated in the protocol's module 'SwiftyUserDefaults'
. So is it even possible to change the bridge for types that have already been implemented in the module?Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: