Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add gcc9 cuda11 pipeline in CSCS CI #863

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023
Merged

Add gcc9 cuda11 pipeline in CSCS CI #863

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

aurianer
Copy link
Contributor

@aurianer aurianer commented Nov 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Part of #32

Forces use of fmt@9 (see problems with fmt@10 spack/spack#41317)

@aurianer aurianer added the category: CI Continuous Integration label Nov 20, 2023
@aurianer aurianer added this to the 0.21.0 milestone Nov 20, 2023
@aurianer aurianer self-assigned this Nov 20, 2023
@aurianer aurianer marked this pull request as draft November 20, 2023 11:40
@aurianer aurianer mentioned this pull request Nov 20, 2023
Merged
@msimberg
Copy link
Contributor

I think you can manually choose an appropriate fmt version for this pipeline and we look at the required conflicts separately.

@aurianer
Copy link
Contributor Author

cscs-ci run

@aurianer aurianer mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2023
Closed
@aurianer
Copy link
Contributor Author

cscs-ci run

@aurianer aurianer force-pushed the add_gcc9_cuda11_cscsci branch 3 times, most recently from a356a6e to 957b301 Compare November 28, 2023 16:18
@aurianer
Copy link
Contributor Author

cscs-ci run

1 similar comment
@aurianer
Copy link
Contributor Author

cscs-ci run

@aurianer aurianer marked this pull request as ready for review November 29, 2023 17:55
msimberg
msimberg requested changes Dec 4, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@msimberg msimberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only a cosmetic comment. Feel free to merge after updating that.

examples/jacobi_smp/jacobi_nonuniform_omp.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pika-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

pika-bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Performance test report

pika Performance

Comparison

BENCHMARKNO-EXECUTOR
Future Overhead - Create Thread Hierarchical - Latch-

Info

PropertyBeforeAfter
pika Datetime2023-08-21T11:44:55+00:002023-12-04T17:18:22+00:00
pika Commit02f9de8a262719
Clusternamedaintdaint
Envfile
Datetime2023-08-21T13:50:51.685166+02:002023-12-04T18:37:34.851347+01:00
Compiler/apps/daint/SSL/pika/spack/lib/spack/env/clang/clang++ 11.0.1/apps/daint/SSL/pika/spack/lib/spack/env/clang/clang++ 11.0.1
Hostnamenid01181nid00446

Explanation of Symbols

SymbolMEANING
=No performance change (confidence interval within ±1%)
(=)Probably no performance change (confidence interval within ±2%)
(+)/(-)Very small performance improvement/degradation (≤1%)
+/-Small performance improvement/degradation (>10%)
++/--Large performance improvement/degradation (>10%)
+++/---Very large performance improvement/degradation (>10%)
?Probably no change, but quite large uncertainty (confidence interval with ±5%)
??Unclear result, very large uncertainty (±10%)
???Something unexpected…

@msimberg
Copy link
Contributor

msimberg commented Dec 5, 2023

cscs-ci run

@aurianer aurianer added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 5, 2023
Merged via the queue into pika-org:main with commit ddccb50 Dec 5, 2023
66 of 67 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@msimberg msimberg msimberg approved these changes

@biddisco biddisco Awaiting requested review from biddisco biddisco is a code owner

Assignees

@aurianer aurianer

Labels
category: CI Continuous Integration
Projects
pika planning board
Status: Archive
Milestone
0.21.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@aurianer @msimberg @pika-bot