Rename fields in contracts metadata

[smiasojed]

In the metadata we provide following informations:

						"solc_zkvm_edition": null,
						"zk_version": "0.1.0"

I suppose we should change it to revive_version/resolc_version

[athei]

Isn't resolc= revive? So it should be solc_version and revive_version?

[smiasojed]

it is the same, I am not sure which convention we should follow resolc or revive.
solc has its own metadata:
"solc_metadata": "{\"compiler\":{\"version\":\"0.8.26+commit.8a97fa7a\"},...}

[xermicus]

revive is the project and workspace name and resolc the binary name of the Solidity frontend (matter labs names them in a similar fasion: "era compiler" is the overall compiler project name and zksolc the Solidity frontend binary). We could add more frontends if needed, for example Vyper, or potentially some other binaries, which would still belong and live in revive.

We should rename those fields too:
zk_version -> revive_version
solc_zkvm_edition -> pallet_revive_version

[xermicus]

Isn't resolc= revive? So it should be solc_version and revive_version?

As for the version, this should hold up. E.g. the revive version will dictate the resolc version anyways.