Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add skydive #71

Open
sivakom opened this issue Jul 15, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Add skydive #71

sivakom opened this issue Jul 15, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@sivakom
Copy link

sivakom commented Jul 15, 2016

Install the skydive controller into it’s own container, and also add the skydive agents into each of the containers running ovn-controller.

@huikang
Copy link
Collaborator

huikang commented Jul 15, 2016

@sivakom could you elaborate more in this proposal? Thanks. - Hui

@hzhou8
Copy link
Collaborator

hzhou8 commented Jul 15, 2016

@sivakom thanks for the proposal, but I have the same question as Hui. Could you clarify the reason why we need skydive in scale-test env? Would skydive help provide data for scalability?

@sivakom
Copy link
Author

sivakom commented Jul 16, 2016

Yes definitely. Skydive provides an abundance of data regarding the topology flows and information from all of the ovn-controller chassis, which is then aggregated into topology graphs in the skydive analyzer. This allows us to see how all of the various network components are interacting amongst each other, especially in such a large scale. Feel free to add anything that I might have missed @mestery.

@huikang
Copy link
Collaborator

huikang commented Jul 16, 2016

@sivakom thanks for the explanation. I am looking forward to the implementation.

@hzhou8
Copy link
Collaborator

hzhou8 commented Jul 17, 2016

@sivakom so the purpose is to see how skydive would work in a large scale deployment. I think it is valuable 👍

@huikang huikang assigned blp and unassigned blp Jul 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants