Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sorting Parameters #136

Open
uvoges opened this issue May 5, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Sorting Parameters #136

uvoges opened this issue May 5, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
Part 2 Issues to be resolved prior to TC vote

Comments

@uvoges
Copy link

uvoges commented May 5, 2020

In API Records we determined is that sorting parameters would be important to have the opportunity to sort a resultset and to page through sorted results.

#opengeospatial/ogcapi-records#22

In https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=73994 (chapter 7.2.6) we have worked it out in detail.

@cmheazel cmheazel added the Collections Applicable to Collections (consider to use Part 2 instead) label May 11, 2020
@jyutzler
Copy link

I recommend adding the "Future Work" label.

@cmheazel cmheazel added the Future Work Good idea cache - defer or allocate to another SWG label Sep 11, 2020
@joanma747 joanma747 added Part 2 Issues to be resolved prior to TC vote and removed Collections Applicable to Collections (consider to use Part 2 instead) labels Mar 14, 2024
@jerstlouis
Copy link
Member

jerstlouis commented Mar 14, 2024

This should be addressed (in the context of querying list of collections) by main issue #314 reorganizing Simple Query based on Records Local Resource Catalogs.

@jerstlouis jerstlouis removed the Future Work Good idea cache - defer or allocate to another SWG label Mar 14, 2024
@jerstlouis
Copy link
Member

We have a draft Sortable Collections requirement class now, which still needs to be filled up, starting from the Features and/or Records (collections as a Local Resource Catalog) requirements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Part 2 Issues to be resolved prior to TC vote
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants