Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generic Compressed Data Format #21

Open
oeed opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 8 comments
Open

Generic Compressed Data Format #21

oeed opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@oeed
Copy link
Owner

oeed commented Jan 13, 2016

It's be good to standardise a format to essentially ZIP something. It would also be good if the format would allow the package to be self-extractable and loadable directly as a table without extracting.

I've had various renditions of this in the past, mainly using textutils.serialise, but it'd be good to have a compressed binary based version if that's remotely feasible.

@oeed
Copy link
Owner Author

oeed commented Jan 13, 2016

Well if someone feels like making a ZIP library for CC we'd all be very happy.

@viluon
Copy link
Collaborator

viluon commented Jan 13, 2016

eeh, no offence, but this is awfully generic, and doesn't actually follow what we tell users to do in the README (and the in-progress tutorial branch)! First write the proposal and discuss how the result should look like, then deal with Issues and PRs. This isn't a format that already exists, and there's no need to add invent it at this point. That's just not the purpose of this repo. Develop the format, then make a PR, that's the strategy.

@oeed
Copy link
Owner Author

oeed commented Jan 13, 2016

Fair point, although I do think having a label for things that need standardising would be useful so people know to make an RFC for it.

@viluon viluon changed the title Write up RFC for a package format Generic Compressed Data Format Jan 13, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 7, 2016

i think archive and compressing formats should be seperated (see .tar.gz for example), that would also allow someone to only compress one file and dont have to use an archive

@viluon
Copy link
Collaborator

viluon commented Jan 26, 2017

Bump, any reason to keep this around?

@lyqyd
Copy link
Collaborator

lyqyd commented Jan 26, 2017

I think this could be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@lyqyd @oeed @viluon and others