ObjectACL, BucketACL not quite correct behavior

[evgeniiz321]

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/managing-acls.html

Bucket and object permissions are independent of each other. An object does not inherit the permissions from its bucket. For example, if you create a bucket and grant write access to a user, you can't access that user’s objects unless the user explicitly grants you access.

1. Create bucket with public-read-write ACL
2. Create object1 with public-read-write ACL
3. Create object2 without ACL (by default, access should be allowed only by an object owner)
4. Try to get/put obj2 from a not owner - access allowed, but should be denied

Seems to be related to #904, but this one is a more general issue.

[smallhive]

I consider, bucket with public-read-write leads to object2 with public-read-write by default, according to the bucket rules

[roman-khimov]

Yeah, that's somewhat strange and I'd expect object2 to be accessible. Is this behavior confirmed for AWS?

[roman-khimov]

Similar to #904.