Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Statement on Tools (R-Markdown) #23

Open
craig-shenton opened this issue Nov 1, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Statement on Tools (R-Markdown) #23

craig-shenton opened this issue Nov 1, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@craig-shenton
Copy link
Contributor

I have collated examples of R-Markdown reports from the Technical Group and all of the samples received are embedded HTML reports and are using interactive charts with Plotly (or similar). I had been working on the assumption that PowerPoint was still the default in the NHS (and thus using ggplot/images). Clearly, there are many advantages to the interactive reports and all the feedback relayed has been positive. However, I still feel there is pushback against their use, largely because there are not part of the MS ecosystem and people are worried about how it might be received.

Therefore, I would propose a statement for the Steering Group to agree, similar to the NHS-R community ‘Statement on tools’, endorsing the use of:

  • HTML format reports (over PowerPoint)
  • Interactive charts (Plotly)
  • Quarto (available on UDAL VMs)

This would go a long way to giving NHSE managers the confidence to go with the best technology and move the org to a code-first / open-source way of working.

We could collaborate with the NHS-R community on this.

@craig-shenton craig-shenton added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Nov 1, 2022
@craig-shenton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants