Large bundle & other tech debt

[elliotBraem]

While investigating the large bundle size of another project, I noticed the size of near-wallet-selector took up a pretty hefty portion (60 KB gzip), despite only being a wallet-selector modal with separate, composable modules.

See version @near-wallet-selector/core#8.9.10 on Bundlephobia

In investigating this, I also found that v8.9.11 introduced double the size (122 KB gzip), seemingly because of a near-api-js upgrade/using many modules, @noble in account-export package, and what I'm assuming is poor code splitting.

Some things I've noticed:

• We are building for esm and cjs -- why CommonJS if wallet selector is always running in the browser?
• Since we're running in the browser, I don't think we need all these polyfills? Should just be using built-ins
• Slimedrgn pointed out the multi-language support in core's locale. This should be lazy loaded, no?
• We export more than just the entry in our bundle -- moreover, it doesn't seem we have a production configured build? No minification
• core package uses the Nx/react rollup config despite holding no react code. External dependency being jsx-runtime doesn't match up either then.
• I'm not sure if nx w/ rollup is able to shake these shared dependencies out or not... it might not matter... but there are a lot of misc shared dependencies in root package.json which makes installing this project take soooo long and really stresses out my already running-out-of-space laptop (along with this, I think there are several unused dependencies here)

And then some miscellaneous items

• main, module, and types are defined in wallet-selector root package.json, despite being non-existant files (I'm assuming this is remnant from before the monorepo)
• Duplicate configs in ts and js scattered across the repo
• Some wallets are tested, some are not; the tests defined in project root is just the default jest example test

It seems to me like a lot of this is just tech debt that hasn't been addressed from 2 years ago after migrating to a monorepo (and that's okay :) ). Otherwise, I'd really like to learn more about why any of these choices were made, what changes should be implemented, and I'd like to help in any way I can, as well!

Hoping to start a conversation on some of these items -- I feel like the wallet selector is a cornerstone package for the ecosystem and should not bear so much weight on any application integrating it.

[pivanov]

I'm working on something to reduce the size ... excluding everything you mentioned and with which I agree we have few more things to mention ... we have a bg CSS file (~40KB) in modal-ui.

Here is a shot with the changes in next release the size is ~ because we are waiting few more things to be merged but still ;) ...

@near-wallet-selector/core (hopefully next release)

this will help for now ... but still ... there is more space for improvements :)