You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the tool does no automated management of orders once place - this is left as a tasks for the user.
An enhancement would be to wait until all orders were filled and manage orders until they are filled.
From RW James:
Simple "passive aggressive" logic:
For a buy
Specify an offset in ticks as x% of the (mean) bid ask spread, rounded up.
Specify an offset to "chase" as y% of the (mean) bid ask spread, rounded up
Bid at the best ask less the offset number of ticks
Wait. If fully filled, done.
If best offer moves reset offset ticks away from your bid, cancel and reset what is remaining to get filled.
If not filled after , reduce the offset to get more aggressive, until it's marketable.
Further on:
Q: what's a sensible default for x and y in the logic above?
RJ: for liquid stuff i think quoting the middle is good for x
RJ: for less liquid crap (CRO) might want to be a bit more aggressive and sit a bit further over where someone with a shorter term horizon can pick you off
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
More urgent is that we also need to handle the case where post-only orders are immediately cancelled as they would cross the book. This presumably means that the market is actually moving in a favourable direction w.r.t. the delta we are wanting to trade, so just keep resubmitting the order at ever more advantageous price until we get one to stick.
Currently the tool does no automated management of orders once place - this is left as a tasks for the user.
An enhancement would be to wait until all orders were filled and manage orders until they are filled.
From RW James:
Further on:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: