xz package does not provide unversioned liblzma.so symlink

[jkoritzinsky]

Describe the bug
The xz package provides versioned SOs, /usr/lib/liblzma.so.5 and /usr/lib/liblzma.5.4.4, but it does not provide /usr/lib/liblzma.so. This breaks any tooling that looks up liblzma.so without a version, such as through autotools.

This was found on a docker image based on azurelinuxpreview.azurecr.io/public/azurelinux/base/core:3.0 with no additional packages installed.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Run docker run --rm -it azurelinuxpreview.azurecr.io/public/azurelinux/base/core:3.0 bash
2. In the container, run ls /usr/lib/liblzma.so*

Expected behavior

There should be three files, liblzma.so, liblzma.so.5 and liblzma.so.5.4.4, where they each symlink (possibly transitively) to liblzma.so.5.4.4

[zcobol]

@jkoritzinsky if you inspect the xz.spec the link is created during package installation:

azurelinux/SPECS/xz/xz.spec

Line 51 in 5b01d26

ln -svf "../..%{_libdir}/$(readlink %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblzma.so)" %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblzma.so

and ls output:

zcobol@azurelinux [ ~ ]$ ls -l /usr/lib/liblzma.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Apr 23  2022 /usr/lib/liblzma.so -> ../../usr/lib/liblzma.so.5.2.5

I suspect it's a Docker container assembly issue.

[jkoritzinsky]

Yes, I suspect that it is an issue with the Azure Linux 3.0 docker image construction (which I believe is also defined in this repo).

[jkoritzinsky]

Looping back to this, it's still an issue with the released AzureLinux 3.0 base image. It wasn't a one-off image build issue.