You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the time metric in Papermark seems to track the time a document is open, regardless of whether the user is actively viewing it. Recently, one of our recipients left the document open overnight, resulting in an inflated time-on-page of over 1900 minutes. This severely distorted our graphs and statistics, making them unreliable.
Proposed Solution:
Implement a more accurate time tracking mechanism that accounts for user inactivity. Possible approaches include:
Inactivity Timeout: Pause the time tracking after a certain period of no user interaction (e.g., 2 or 5 minutes without mouse movement, clicks, or scrolling).
Tab Activity Detection: Stop tracking time when the document’s tab is not in focus or the browser window is minimized.
Maybe a mix?
Impact:
This change will lead to more accurate and reliable statistics, preventing extreme cases like this from skewing the data and ensuring that the time-on-page metrics better reflect actual user engagement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Inactivity Timeout: Pause the time tracking after a certain period of no user interaction (e.g., 2 or 5 minutes without mouse movement, clicks, or scrolling).
I like that. Specifically mouse/keyboard activity to determine inactivity.
Tab Activity Detection: Stop tracking time when the document’s tab is not in focus or the browser window is minimized.
We are already doing this, however this is not perfect either.
If you want to open a PR to improve this, it would be awesome. Otherwise, we probably can get to it next week.
P.s.: You can email me in support@ with your documentId and accountId and I remove the overstated analytics for you.
Currently, the time metric in Papermark seems to track the time a document is open, regardless of whether the user is actively viewing it. Recently, one of our recipients left the document open overnight, resulting in an inflated time-on-page of over 1900 minutes. This severely distorted our graphs and statistics, making them unreliable.
Proposed Solution:
Implement a more accurate time tracking mechanism that accounts for user inactivity. Possible approaches include:
Maybe a mix?
Impact:
This change will lead to more accurate and reliable statistics, preventing extreme cases like this from skewing the data and ensuring that the time-on-page metrics better reflect actual user engagement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: