Output of interpolated selector with nested rules is different than written out

[chazsolo]

I noticed this while playing around with selector interpolation on less2css.org (v2.5.3):

If I use an interpolated selector with nested rules, the output is not what I expected (when compared to written out). For example, the given input:

@classes: ~".a, .b, .c";

@{classes} {  
  + .z {
    color: blue; 
  }
}

.p, .q, .r {
  + .z {
    color: blue;
  }
}

provides the following output:

.a, .b, .c + .z {
  color: blue;
}
.p + .z,
.q + .z,
.r + .z {
  color: blue;
}

Shouldn't the interpolated class output include + .z for each selector instead of just the final one, .c?

[seven-phases-max]

No. In short ~".a, .b, .c" is not a list of selectors. See #1421 and other issues referenced there for more details.

[seven-phases-max]

Closing as duplicate of #1546 (but the mother issue is #1421, there's also an issue somewhere with more details on possible implementations and syntax for the desired feature but I can't find it right now: todo).