Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong step described in the documentation #7400

Open
msgx opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Wrong step described in the documentation #7400

msgx opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@msgx
Copy link

msgx commented Jul 9, 2024

Problem with this page

Pipeline: Build Step page

Expected behavior

Description of the build step, e.g. as here: https://youtu.be/lCSMialN7kU?t=55

Actual behavior

Description of the waitForBuild step.

Possible solution

No response

Are you interested in contributing a fix?

No response

@msgx msgx added the bug label Jul 9, 2024
@zbynek
Copy link
Contributor

zbynek commented Jul 9, 2024

The build step plugin provides both waitForBuild and build steps, so I'd expect both of them to be mentioned in the page you linked. For some reason the build step documentation was moved to https://www.jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/steps/eiffel-broadcaster/ -- to fix that either https://github.com/jenkinsci/eiffel-broadcaster-plugin needs to be fixed to define its own steps in a more conventional way or https://github.com/jenkins-infra/pipeline-steps-doc-generator needs to be extended to deal with that

@msgx
Copy link
Author

msgx commented Jul 10, 2024

Thank you for your investigation, @zbynek! The only question is who can be responsible for fixing the issue?

@lemeurherve
Copy link
Member

lemeurherve commented Jul 10, 2024

who can be responsible for fixing the issue?

Anyone, that can be you @msgx if you're interested contributing 🙂
(Though it doesn't seem the easiest issue to start with ^^)

@msgx
Copy link
Author

msgx commented Jul 10, 2024

@lemeurherve, thank you for believing in me so much, but I'm not going to dive into such topic at the moment.)

@MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to the earlier report

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants