[EC67] rule improvment : "++i" statement is not so bad

[dedece35]

Describe the bug
The rule wants us to change "i++" to "++i" statement.
But often "i++" has a really functionnal usage like screenshot below.

Expected behavior
improve actual behaviour to detect if "i++" statement is used alone or not (example : in a concatenation string).
if alone, ok raise the issue. if not, don't raise issue because we don't know if "i++" has a functionnal usage or not.

Screenshots

Software Versions

• SonarQube Version: 10.3
• Plugin Version: java plugin 1.4.3

[diyfr]

in c the only case where a temporary variable is created is during combined use
In this case, no temporary variable :
for (int i=0; i< 10; i++) or for (int i=0; i< 10; ++i)
the increment is an isolated operation
It's same in

while(myValue){
// Your code here, change myValue

//increment
i++;
}