Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[EC69] - check relevance of this rule #21

Open
dedece35 opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[EC69] - check relevance of this rule #21

dedece35 opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
🗃️ rule rule improvment or rule development or bug

Comments

@dedece35
Copy link
Member

like in python issue green-code-initiative/ecoCode-python#21, check if implemented EC69 rule in java plugin is relevant or not
@dedece35 dedece35 added the 🗃️ rule rule improvment or rule development or bug label Mar 22, 2024
@dedece35 dedece35 mentioned this issue Mar 22, 2024
Open
@pataluc pataluc mentioned this issue May 30, 2024
Open
pataluc pushed a commit to max-208/ecoCode-java that referenced this issue May 30, 2024
@pataluc
fix: Improve EC69
68bf749 
chore: Add false positive test case
fix: 🐛 removed false positives
fix: 💡 fix comments and remove logs
docs: 📝 remove comment and useless imports

Fix green-code-initiative#21
This was referenced May 30, 2024
Open
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🗃️ rule rule improvment or rule development or bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dedece35