Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite using functional components #68

Open
chrstnbwnkl opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 10 comments
Open

Rewrite using functional components #68

chrstnbwnkl opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 10 comments

Comments

@chrstnbwnkl
Copy link
Member

While React class components are not going anywhere any time soon, functional components have become the new norm. A rewrite using functional components and hooks could make the application future proof and might offer a way to simplify the code along the way (especially the React <-> Leaflet interactions, which are all buried inside one big Map component).

@inceptionabhishek
Copy link
Contributor

Please Assign me this issue, I can work on this.

@aa98-45556443355666
Copy link

I want to work on this issue . Kindly assign it to me.

@nilsnolde
Copy link
Member

This is too big for applicants, it'll be part of the main GSoC project.

@theWiseAman
Copy link
Contributor

@nilsnolde Can I work on some files though? I have experience as a ReactJS Developer so I know what is being asked here. So can you assign me this issue?

@nilsnolde
Copy link
Member

Then you'd handle it pretty efficiently once the project started I think. There are lots of open, unassigned issues, please choose one of those. It's more important for the pre-selection to see how you do things you're not familiar with.

@sammaji
Copy link

sammaji commented Mar 4, 2023

While React class components are not going anywhere any time soon, functional components have become the new norm. A rewrite using functional components and hooks could make the application future proof and might offer a way to simplify the code along the way (especially the React <-> Leaflet interactions, which are all buried inside one big Map component).

@chrstnbwnkl This is a pretty big issue. It is better to handle it in parts. Would be nice, if you could provide a list of files that need work first.

@nilsnolde
Copy link
Member

Again, reading capability is a requirement.

@sammaji
Copy link

sammaji commented Mar 4, 2023

Again, reading capability is a requirement.

Can you point out some issue that needs solving?

@tommach591
Copy link
Contributor

I submitted a proposal for GSoC 2023 to work on this issue and I was wondering if there are any feedbacks on it.

@Ananya2001-an
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @nilsnolde do u think I should start working on this on the side....it will take time but better to start now so that later on other issues can also be resolved and anyways I am free ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

8 participants