Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auto donate-to-charity feature #356

Open
dsernst opened this issue Mar 6, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

auto donate-to-charity feature #356

dsernst opened this issue Mar 6, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@dsernst
Copy link
Member

dsernst commented Mar 6, 2015

Talking with friends and potential users, a significant number of people independently suggested letting users automatically donate some of their Gilded earning to charity.

It's not that hard of a technical problem, and I think it would go a long way.

logistics:

  • we can give the user a config setting, called donationRate, 0 < x < 1, for a percentage of their earnings to automatically donate to charity.
  • the whole thing is opt-in so we're not forcing anyone to give anything away.
  • we can tell them their total earned for donation, as another incentive for them to continue using the service.

benefits:

  • it keeps the signal-to-noise filter in place
  • it immediately defuses cynical notions of the service
  • it might allow senders to feel more comfortable paying for messages, knowing that their money is going to charity too
  • it makes the whole product's narrative easier to market
  • the revenue earned by any one user of the service is probably not all that substantial, anyway, so the good-will earned with this may be more valuable overall
  • and making the whole service more emotionally palatable might end up re-couping the losses with additional usage, anyway
@dsernst dsernst changed the title auto share with charity feature auto donate-to-charity feature Mar 6, 2015
@dsernst
Copy link
Member Author

dsernst commented Mar 6, 2015

@nlokare @csreyes @bcbcb: everyone reply with how much of priority you think this should be, 1-10

@dsernst
Copy link
Member Author

dsernst commented Mar 6, 2015

I say 8/10

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant