Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: replace @edx/paragon and @edx/frontend-build #38

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

Mashal-m
Copy link

@Mashal-m Mashal-m commented Dec 29, 2023

Description

Part of openedx/axim-engineering#23

This replaces the @edx/paragon and @edx/frontend-build package.
Imports have been updated to use the same locations in the new package.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 29, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.36%. Comparing base (b84a138) to head (42dc481).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #38   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.36%   81.36%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         220      220           
  Branches       30       30           
=======================================
  Hits          179      179           
  Misses         39       39           
  Partials        2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Mashal-m Mashal-m changed the title Mashal m/replace edx/paragon frontend build refactor: replace @edx/paragon and @edx/frontend-build Jan 1, 2024
@BilalQamar95 BilalQamar95 marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2024 06:09
@BilalQamar95 BilalQamar95 self-assigned this Feb 23, 2024
@BilalQamar95 BilalQamar95 force-pushed the mashal-m/replace-edx/paragon-frontend-build branch from 810510e to 42dc481 Compare March 25, 2024 09:16
@BilalQamar95
Copy link
Contributor

PR is no longer required since these packages upgrades were taken care of as part of recently merged #47

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants