Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Title of issues generated for edamontology #193

Open
matuskalas opened this issue May 15, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Title of issues generated for edamontology #193

matuskalas opened this issue May 15, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@matuskalas
Copy link
Member

Context: Generating an issue in https://github.com/edamontology/edamontology after filling in the change proposal form in the EDAM Browser.

I'd suggest changing the pre-filled [Edam Browser User] Change proposition for ... to something like [EDAM Browser user] Change request for ... or [EDAM Browser user] Change proposal for ..., so that it parses better.

Native English speakers, do you have a better suggestion?

@raashika03
Copy link
Contributor

raashika03 commented May 15, 2021

I'm prioritising sentences here accordingly with some reasons:

  1. [EDAM Browser user] Proposing changes for ...
    Sounds more clear to the user. It clearly shows that (s) he is proposing changes to the existing term.
  2. [EDAM Browser user] Change proposal for ...,
    It signifies This's a "change proposal" so they should come together. They should be objectified together for clarity.
    Like [EDAM Browser user] 'Change proposal' for ...
  3. [EDAM Browser user] Change request for ...
    This should be changed to [EDAM Browser user] Requesting changes for ...
    This sounds so humble( thus can create confusion) so prioritising it at the last.
    @matuskalas

@matuskalas
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for your quick analysis @raashika03! 🙏🏽

What about [EDAM Browser user] Proposing changes to ...?

@bryan-brancotte
Copy link
Member

Highly related to #27

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants