rename atoms_sold Column in period_slippage

[bh2smith]

    I wonder if it would make sense to rename the column after the fee is considered to make it more explicit that we are already accounting for surplus (I remember a Uniswap data analysis where they accounted for the LP twice because they didn't realize it was already accounted for in some earlier step of the process).

Something like atoms_sold - coalesce(surplus_fee, 0) as atoms_sold_after_fee,

Originally posted by @fleupold in #160 (comment)

[rblcoder]

What should the column be renamed to?

[bh2smith]

Well the current working suggestion is:

atoms_sold_after_few

The problem here is that the query will need to be updated to and we would like to "own" the query. If you are planning to implement this change, then I would propose that you fork our current query, make the necessary changes then we will fork yours and use that.