Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement: Add option to use 7zip during packaging step #4

Open
coxp opened this issue Nov 27, 2011 · 6 comments
Open

Enhancement: Add option to use 7zip during packaging step #4

coxp opened this issue Nov 27, 2011 · 6 comments

Comments

@coxp
Copy link

coxp commented Nov 27, 2011

The default nant zip task does not compress the package very well. It would be nice to have an option to compress the package using 7zip instead.

This would help developers deploy over slower connections and also reduce the disk space used if keeping a history of all build artifacts (for instance when using Teamcity).

@drusellers
Copy link
Member

are you thinking we would ship the 7zip exe?

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Member

I'm thinking we look at the task and possibly ship the 7zip (or chocolatey it up) - http://chocolatey.org/packages/7zip.commandline

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Member

Do you have a working example of how we could do this?

@coxp
Copy link
Author

coxp commented May 20, 2015

I have been using this for years now but my solution removes support for standard zip files. I'd like to get this in the base project if possible rather than maintaining a custom version.

TBH, I think the ideal solution for me would be a better deployment story if the build system could generate something that is later used by the deployment system. For instance, a huge amount of the upload is libraries shared by the projects in the solution (e.g. Topshelf, Masstransit, Windsor, etc.), that could be restored on the server with the help of nuget.

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Member

@coxp NuGet stuffs is already built in so perhaps that is the path forward?

@coxp
Copy link
Author

coxp commented Aug 25, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants