Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

synergizer.jar and orthoxml-0.1b.jar are not open source #53

Open
stain opened this issue Aug 30, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

synergizer.jar and orthoxml-0.1b.jar are not open source #53

stain opened this issue Aug 30, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@stain
Copy link
Member

stain commented Aug 30, 2017

under org.bridgedb.webservice.synergizer we include lib/synergizer.jar as a system dependency, so anyone using this module would also need to add synergizer.jar to their own class path.

I tried to find the copyright/license for this JAR, and it looks like it is http://llama.mshri.on.ca/cgi/download/download.pl?software=Synergizer-Java-Client which does not look OSI compatible to me - and also requires notification sent to Harvard within 60 days. Have we sent such a notice, and do we have permission to redistribute the JAR in GitHub? At the very least we are not propagating their copyright as required.

So I wonder what agreement, if any, have been made. From the looks of it it seems we can't put this JAR in the GitHub repository which claims to be under Apache License v2.0.

Similar question is for orthoxml-0.1b.jar from http://orthoxml.org/xml/OrthoXML_Java.html which does not seem to have a license at all (!)

@egonw
Copy link
Member

egonw commented Sep 8, 2017

@amarillion, what can you comment on this?

@amarillion
Copy link

I don't recall that we ever explicitly tried to meet the synergizer terms, or that we sought clarification on OrthoXML. I searched my email archive to be sure, and there is no mention of this.

I'm sure this might be resolved with a brief email to the authors in both cases. Btw, I don't think it's a requirement that synergizer be OSI compatible - just that we have permission to redistribute the jar if we do so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants