Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document difference to bitcoin core #41

Open
benma opened this issue Feb 16, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Document difference to bitcoin core #41

benma opened this issue Feb 16, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@benma
Copy link

benma commented Feb 16, 2017

I can't find any information on what this fork implements exactly over bitcoin core, apart from "additional indexing". It would be nice to extend the README with detailed specification of the API calls added.
@lclc
Copy link

lclc commented Apr 9, 2017

The additional features (more indexing and RPC calls for accessing those) are documented here: https://bitcore.io/guides/bitcoin

But would probably be good to have the documentation in this repo.

LarryRuane pushed a commit to LarryRuane/bitcoin that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2020
Squashed 'src/crc32c/' changes from 224988680f..b5ef9be675
90c0f26 
b5ef9be675 Merge #1: Merge changes from upstream
9e7f512430 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into bitcoin-fork
1f85030246 Add support for ARM64 darwin (bitpay#43)
3bb959c982 Remove unnecessary reinterpret_cast (bitpay#42)
2e97ab26b1 Fix (unused) ReadUint64LE for BE machines (bitpay#41)
47b40d2209 Bump dependencies. (bitpay#40)
ba74185625 Move CI to Visual Studio 2019.
efa301a7e5 Allow different C/C++ standards when this is used as a subproject.
cc6d71465e CMake: Use configure_package_config_file()

git-subtree-dir: src/crc32c
git-subtree-split: b5ef9be6755a2e61e2988bb238f13d1c0ee1fa0a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@benma @lclc