This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 27, 2022. It is now read-only.
What's the next step we should do for dweb? #1953
Unanswered
planetoryd
asked this question in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I heard about dat a long time ago. I tried it and it was not working since here this is China. Ah, censorship sucks. What I'm concerned more is the features of the protocol though.
How does it compare to zeronet, to ipfs, or to retroshare, or ssb. I haven't tried the browser, but it looks exactly what I envisioned, apparently. Does it support multi user content? Is there a decentralized DNS? Is the useless blockchain scam involved ? I've been thinking about this for a long time. And I believe in complete decentralization and autonomy.
Those protocols, any one of them just lack something. And fediverse is not quite successful.
My idea is that we create literally blockchains without being a currency. For each site, there's a blockchain with wasm smart contracts, which is responsible for the democracy. The whole software would act as the docker of dweb, with ipfs being the filesystem. The features include permission management, identity management. Finally, to mitigate bad behavior we introduce web of trust like ssb and retroshare which also creates democracy. Melotte/melotte repo. We really need to find ways to create democracy. Decentralization itself doesn't create it. Look how centralized blockchains are.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions