Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Proper handling of key_agreement #257

Open
nitro-neal opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Proper handling of key_agreement #257

nitro-neal opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@nitro-neal
Copy link
Contributor 

// TODO: If the JWK contains a `use` property with the value "sig" then the `keyAgreement` property
// is not included in the DID Document. If the `use` value is "enc" then only the `keyAgreement`
// property is included in the DID Document.
// key_agreement: if public_jwk.use_.as_deref() != Some("sig") { Some(vec![kid.clone()]) } else { None },
@nitro-neal nitro-neal added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
SDK Development
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nitro-neal