Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unclear wording on SLO page #3681

Open
mflis-sumo opened this issue Feb 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Unclear wording on SLO page #3681

mflis-sumo opened this issue Feb 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
type:feedback Feedback submitted from site or GitHub

Comments

@mflis-sumo
Copy link

Specific page:

https://help.sumologic.com/docs/observability/reliability-management-slo/

This sentence feels out of sync the image it describes:

The following chart shows our calculations and an example 5m window for the month of January where a number of requests were unsuccessful due to a completions that averaged greater than 600ms:
image

AFAIR the image is correct here stating that a time window is marked as bad, because p99(latency) > 500ms, as opposed to avg(latency) > 500 ms

@mflis-sumo mflis-sumo added the type:feedback Feedback submitted from site or GitHub label Feb 16, 2024
@jpipkin1
Copy link
Collaborator

@kimsauce, since SLO is your area, could you look at this issue?

@kimsauce
Copy link
Collaborator

@kimsauce, since SLO is your area, could you look at this issue?

sure thing! thanks for the heads up.

@kimsauce kimsauce self-assigned this Feb 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:feedback Feedback submitted from site or GitHub
Projects
None yet
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

3 participants