We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For statements in [7] of https://github.com/SMTorg/smt/blob/master/tutorial/SMT_Tutorial.ipynb, the shapes for x, y are different from z, and it will get following figure which is different from the figure shown on that web page.
ax.scatter(xt[:, 0], xt[:, 1], yt, zdir='z', marker='x', c='b', s=200, label='Training point') ax.scatter(xtest[:, 0], xtest[:, 1], ytest, zdir='z', marker='.', c='k', s=200, label='Validation point')
Maybe it should be revised as following, but it looks like that there's still a little different.
ax.scatter(xt[:, 0], xt[:, 1], yt[:, 0], zdir='z', marker='x', c='b', s=200, label='Training point') ax.scatter(xtest[:, 0], xtest[:, 1], ytest[:, 0], zdir='z', marker='.', c='k', s=200, label='Validation point')
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you very much for noticing the problem and proposing a fix! It most likely is related to the release of numpy 2.0.0.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Installed numpy on my windows: 1.26.4.
No branches or pull requests
For statements in [7] of https://github.com/SMTorg/smt/blob/master/tutorial/SMT_Tutorial.ipynb, the shapes for x, y are different from z, and it will get following figure which is different from the figure shown on that web page.
Maybe it should be revised as following, but it looks like that there's still a little different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: