Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add requirements for Read the Docs builds #4

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 26, 2020
Merged

Add requirements for Read the Docs builds #4

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 26, 2020

Conversation

namurphy
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

For the moment this is to make sure that it is working.  Later on, it would help
to reorganize them nicely as in the main PlasmaPy repo (i.e., in a requirements
directory).
@StanczakDominik
Copy link
Member

Did you happen to set it up on RTD as well? We could set up its own docs CI.

@namurphy
Copy link
Member Author

I did mostly set it up on RTD, and I just added a webhook just now. I also gave you maintainer superpowers for this set of docs.

@StanczakDominik
Copy link
Member

All right, thanks! :) Do you think you could sign us up for the RTD doc builder this time as per https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/guides/autobuild-docs-for-pull-requests.html#autobuild-documentation-for-pull-requests ? I've been reviewing VlaPy for a while and urgently need to make some pancakes. 🥞

@namurphy
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. I added it as #5 so we don't forget.

@namurphy namurphy merged commit 1d30a39 into master Apr 26, 2020
@namurphy
Copy link
Member Author

There be docs here!

@namurphy namurphy added the Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Apr 26, 2020
@namurphy namurphy deleted the fix-docs-req branch August 14, 2020 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants