Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow for metadata in smaller units than whole CDs #40

Closed
jbs1 opened this issue Jul 6, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Allow for metadata in smaller units than whole CDs #40

jbs1 opened this issue Jul 6, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jbs1
Copy link

jbs1 commented Jul 6, 2016

migrated from Trac, where originally posted by clange on 13-Jun-2008 5:26pm

… as single symbols or examples can also have distinct authors. See http://kwarc.info/projects/swim/pubs/semwiki08-notation-semantics.pdf, section 3 and 4 for a motivation from a use case.

This proposal is related to #38 and #39, as the latter approaches would easily allow for metadata anywhere.

As a reasonable granularity for metadata, I propose

  • the CD level (as we have it now in OM2)
  • the symbol level (CDDefinitions or signatures or notation definitions)
  • some children of CDDefinition: CMP, FMP, Example, and related ones to be introduced in OM3. It's easy to imagine that an Example has a different author than the CDDefinition itself or than a CMP within the CDDefinition.
@jbs1 jbs1 self-assigned this Jul 6, 2016
@jbs1
Copy link
Author

jbs1 commented Jul 6, 2016

migrated from Trac, where originally posted by jhd on 13-Jun-2008 11:10pm

This certainly seems reasonable, and the use case "It's easy to imagine that an Example has a different author than the CDDefinition itself or than a CMP within the CDDefinition" is pretty compelling.
If it falls out of the others, so much the better.

@jbs1
Copy link
Author

jbs1 commented Jul 6, 2016

migrated from Trac, where originally posted by clange on 16-May-2014 12:49am

Still reasonable IMHO but would require a major redesign. I think we are not ready for this, so feel free to close.

@kohlhase
Copy link
Member

kohlhase commented Oct 2, 2017

no longer relevant.

@kohlhase kohlhase closed this as completed Oct 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants