Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a sample 17 Observables with redux-observables & ReactiveX.js #33

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

linuxonrails
Copy link
Collaborator

@linuxonrails linuxonrails changed the title Create a sample _17 Observables_ with redux-observables & ReactiveX.js Create a sample 17 Observables with redux-observables & ReactiveX.js Dec 15, 2016

export const ColorDisplayer = (props: Props) => {
// `rgb(${props.color.red},${props.color.green}, ${props.color.blue}) })`
// "rgb(" + props.color.red + ", 40, 80)"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we remove this commented code?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK.

action$.ofType(actionsEnums.MEMBER_REQUEST_STARTED).mergeMap(action =>
memberAPI.getAllMembers()
// Asynchronously wait 2000ms then continue
.delay(2000)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, we could add as well another source via websockets (I think in the link you provided there was once against stock exchange value not sure if public)

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
import * as React from "react";

export const NameEditComponent = (props: {userName: string, onChange: (name: string) => any}) => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would remove all the components that are not related with the sample itself, just to get thing simpler, I would keep only the member list components, actions, reducers, what do you think?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it's better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants