-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proper error handling in RMQ DB. #34
Milestone
Comments
lpottier
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2024
- Broker will restart if underlying connection is faulty - Broker will send unacknowledged from previous connection (this could result in messages being received twice or more if errors happen with the wrong timing) - Fixed a Static Initialization Order Fiasco (actually destruction fiasco) in ResourceManager and AMS DB Signed-off-by: Loic Pottier <[email protected]>
lpottier
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2024
- Broker will restart if underlying connection is faulty - Broker will send unacknowledged from previous connection (this could result in messages being received twice or more if errors happen with the wrong timing) - Fixed a Static Initialization Order Fiasco (actually destruction fiasco) in ResourceManager and AMS DB Signed-off-by: Loic Pottier <[email protected]>
lpottier
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2024
- Broker will restart if underlying connection is faulty - Broker will send unacknowledged from previous connection (this could result in messages being received twice or more if errors happen with the wrong timing) - Fixed a Static Initialization Order Fiasco (actually destruction fiasco) in ResourceManager and AMS DB Signed-off-by: Loic Pottier <[email protected]>
lpottier
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2024
- Broker will restart if underlying connection is faulty - Broker will send unacknowledged from previous connection (this could result in messages being received twice or more if errors happen with the wrong timing) - Fixed a Static Initialization Order Fiasco (actually destruction fiasco) in ResourceManager and AMS DB Signed-off-by: Loic Pottier <[email protected]>
lpottier
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2024
- Broker will restart if underlying connection is faulty - Broker will send unacknowledged from previous connection (this could result in messages being received twice or more if errors happen with the wrong timing) - Fixed a Static Initialization Order Fiasco (actually destruction fiasco) in ResourceManager and AMS DB Signed-off-by: Loic Pottier <[email protected]>
lpottier
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2024
- Broker will restart if underlying connection is faulty - Broker will send unacknowledged from previous connection (this could result in messages being received twice or more if errors happen with the wrong timing) - Fixed a Static Initialization Order Fiasco (actually destruction fiasco) in ResourceManager and AMS DB Signed-off-by: Loic Pottier <[email protected]>
koparasy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2024
- Broker will restart if underlying connection is faulty - Broker will send unacknowledged from previous connection (this could result in messages being received twice or more if errors happen with the wrong timing) - Fixed a Static Initialization Order Fiasco (actually destruction fiasco) in ResourceManager and AMS DB Signed-off-by: Loic Pottier <[email protected]>
Should we close this? |
Yes, I am closing it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently when errors happen in the AMS lib RMQ database we tend to completely fail. We need to reliably continue execution and re-establish the connection.
This should become after #30 is merged in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: