Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Greenkhorn and screenkhorn - near-linear time sinkhorn #151

Open
flyaflya opened this issue Oct 29, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Greenkhorn and screenkhorn - near-linear time sinkhorn #151

flyaflya opened this issue Oct 29, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@flyaflya
Copy link

Thx for the great package, I have just been toying with it. I noticed there are some newer near-linear time sinkhorn-based algorithms (Greenkhorn and screenkhorn) that are available in POT. The link to the Greenkhorn paper is below.

Just curious if these are on the roadmap for OptimalTransport.jl?

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.09634.pdf

@davibarreira
Copy link
Member

Awesome! Just became. I'll take a look. Thanks!

@davibarreira
Copy link
Member

Curious that these algorithms are not in the Computational Optimal Transport book,

@zsteve
Copy link
Member

zsteve commented Nov 9, 2021

Thx for the great package, I have just been toying with it. I noticed there are some newer near-linear time sinkhorn-based algorithms (Greenkhorn and screenkhorn) that are available in POT. The link to the Greenkhorn paper is below.

Just curious if these are on the roadmap for OptimalTransport.jl?

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.09634.pdf

@flyaflya glad to hear this package has been helpful! I don't think there's any reason why this should not be a candidate algorithm for inclusion. (Basically it will depend on the amount of free time people have xD).
However, if you implement these algorithms as part of your own research, please feel more than welcome to update this issue or make a pull request! If you have existing code, am more than happy to help adapt it to fit into the package.

@davibarreira
Copy link
Member

@flyaflya #159

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants