You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently infection models don't match the composability of the rest of the tooling. In particular you cannot compose multiple iterative processes together. It seems like we should do this. One choice we should make is how much we want to support this across infection models and how much we want to focus on the renewal based generative process.
I think we should support all equally but this probably means implementing slightly less efficient iterative direct infections and growth rate models (and for these models several of the wrapper models we might use might not make sense to use).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently infection models don't match the composability of the rest of the tooling. In particular you cannot compose multiple iterative processes together. It seems like we should do this. One choice we should make is how much we want to support this across infection models and how much we want to focus on the renewal based generative process.
I think we should support all equally but this probably means implementing slightly less efficient iterative direct infections and growth rate models (and for these models several of the wrapper models we might use might not make sense to use).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: