Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Invalid keys generated by GPUs #5

Open
DefiDebauchery opened this issue Sep 25, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Invalid keys generated by GPUs #5

DefiDebauchery opened this issue Sep 25, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@DefiDebauchery
Copy link

DefiDebauchery commented Sep 25, 2022

Continuing the discussion from #2 --

I was indeed able to generate a valid address using my M1 Mac, which I understand had been the majority of the changes in Profanity2. However, GPU support is still an important aspect of this tool, and I'm consistently getting keys that don't match through my environment (Ubuntu 18.02 with Vega 56 GPU(s))

Unfortunately, I admittedly don't know C++, so I'm not sure what direct help I can be, but would be open to testing any potential changes.

@k06a
Copy link
Member

k06a commented Sep 27, 2022

@DefiDebauchery try one more time. If you did no mistakes - this issue should occur very rare.

@DefiDebauchery
Copy link
Author

DefiDebauchery commented Sep 28, 2022

Okay. With the most recent update, this appears to be fixed.

Pardon my naive question, but do you think there would be any way to generate the proper account with the keys provided by the previous build?

@k06a
Copy link
Member

k06a commented Sep 28, 2022

@DefiDebauchery I believe I didn’t changed any logic, it was about dependencies.

@slavik0329
Copy link

On my M1 every key generated by this script does not correlate to the address

@k06a
Copy link
Member

k06a commented Jun 23, 2024

@slavik0329 did you sum private keys correctly?

@slavik0329
Copy link

@k06a That was it 😅
Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@slavik0329 @k06a @DefiDebauchery and others